![paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/M3VN3.png)
paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
![Russell's Paradox Is W in W? In words, W is the set that contains all the sets that don't contain themselves. If W is in W, then W contains itself. But. - Russell's Paradox Is W in W? In words, W is the set that contains all the sets that don't contain themselves. If W is in W, then W contains itself. But. -](https://slideplayer.com/11577970/42/images/slide_1.jpg)
Russell's Paradox Is W in W? In words, W is the set that contains all the sets that don't contain themselves. If W is in W, then W contains itself. But. -
![Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself? Russell's Paradox! - YouTube Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself? Russell's Paradox! - YouTube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8JDgNL5HsPo/maxresdefault.jpg)
Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself? Russell's Paradox! - YouTube
![How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora](https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0d594098c37367bb5793369d81ce2abe.webp)
How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora
![Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And](https://images.slideplayer.com/26/8829980/slides/slide_7.jpg)
Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And
![DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/47421815/mini_magick20190206-25682-1fcwcdd.png?1549519151)
DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu
![Playing Portal 2 for the first time and I noticed it messed up Russell's Paradox in the last one here. : r/gaming Playing Portal 2 for the first time and I noticed it messed up Russell's Paradox in the last one here. : r/gaming](https://i.redd.it/np088e7c8c2z.jpg)